Toyota, NHTSA Investigating California Runaway Prius Incident


I am really feeling sorry for Toyota these days. They’re getting no relief at all from the flood of bad publicity (including on this blog). Here’s the latest after the Prius incident in California:

Coverage of Toyota’s recall crisis surged again this week on reports of another case of a runaway Toyota vehicle, even as Toyota was engaged in a media event meant to refute claims that an electronic fault is to blame for unintended acceleration. All three network news broadcasts led their programs with the story, while several print and online sources also covered the event. ABC World News (3/9, lead story, 3:00, Sawyer) reported on Toyota’s efforts to cope with “the fallout from a frightening drama on a California highway. The federal government dispatched investigators after a Prius raced headlong on a San Diego interstate, more than 90 miles per hour.” The piece features images of the vehicle bumper-to-bumper with a police cruiser that helped to physically slow it, and audio of Prius owner James Sikes’ desperate 911 call.


The CBS Evening News (3/9, lead story, 3:05, Couric) reported that Sikes had tried to have the car serviced under Toyota’s recall, but was turned away. “And now the federal government is involved. They want to know what caused the car to speed out of control. The now-infamous runaway Prius was hauled back to the dealership this morning.”


NBC Nightly News
(3/9, lead story, 2:50, Williams) reported, “The fall of Toyota continues to be one of the most spectacular public relations and technical failures ever suffered by a big company in the modern era. And Toyota sure didn’t need this. Yet another horror story of an unstoppable Toyota on a highway.”


In a follow-up report, NBC Nightly News (3/9, story 2, 3:00, Williams) explores the question of whether there could be an electronic cause of such cases of unintended acceleration, though Toyota continues to vigorously refute this possibility.


The Washington Post (3/10, Ahrens) reports, “Toyota’s run of troubles and terrible timing continues,” noting the juxtaposition of Monday’s press event to debunk reports of an electronic fault causing unintended acceleration in its vehicles with the case of “a Toyota Prius with an apparently stuck gas pedal [which] took its driver on a 30-mile wild ride on an interstate not far from Toyota’s US headquarters in Southern California. Outside of San Diego on Monday, James Sikes found himself behind the wheel of his blue Toyota 2008 Prius hybrid with what he said later was a stuck accelerator. In an interview with ABC News after the incident, from which he emerged safely, Sikes said his Prius sped up to 94 mph on its own.” Sikes reported that the floor mat was not engaged with the pedal, that that attempts to pull it up with his hand failed.


Reuters
(3/10, Gorman, Woodall) reports that Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood said that NHTSA has dispatched investigators to San Diego to investigate the incident. The piece notes that Toyota is also sending investigators, and relates an NHTSA statement saying “NHTSA is reminding owners of all recalled vehicles to contact their dealers immediately if they are experiencing problems.”


The AP (3/10) reports that NHTSA investigators will “try to determine what caused the incident,” adding that “in a statement, Toyota said it has dispatched a field technical specialist to San Diego to investigate the incident,” which according to Sikes “occurred just two weeks after he had taken the vehicle in to an El Cajon dealership for repairs after receiving a recall notice, but he was turned away. ‘I gave them my recall notice and they handed it back and said I’m not on the recall list,’ Sikes said.”


The Los Angeles Times (3/10, Marosi, Olivarez-Giles) relates Sikes story of his ordeal, noting that meanwhile, “a congressional panel investigating unintended acceleration problems with Toyota vehicles said it received another report of a runaway car in San Diego last Friday.”


Another Prius incident in New York.
USA Today (3/10, Hyde, Korngold) that “another driver’s out-of-control Prius slammed into a stone wall in New York on Tuesday,” even as Toyota “sought to contain the fallout from” the California case. “A 56-year-old woman was pulling out of a driveway when her 2005 Prius ’shot’ across the road, Harrison, N.Y., police said.”


The Detroit Free Press (3/10, Korngold) reports that the woman “suffered non-life threatening injuries,” but according to Harrison acting Chief Anthony Marraccini, “The collision sent ’some pretty big boulders’ fairly far. … Marraccini said the floor mat has been pretty much ruled out as a cause.”


Toyota still fine tuning Prius recall fix.
The Detroit News (3/10, Shepardson) reports that Toyota says it is “still working on a fix for the more than 700,000 recalled” Priuses, noting that “almost four months after announcing the recall, Toyota hasn’t begun repairing Prius models because it is still working on its precise remedy, spokesman Brian Lyons said Tuesday.”


Lost value lawsuits could cost Toyota over $3 billion.
The AP (3/10) reports that Toyota owners have filed some 89 class-action lawsuits against Toyota over declining resale value, estimating the potential losses to the company to be in excess of $3 billion. “Those estimates do not include potential payouts for wrongful death and injury lawsuits, which could reach in the tens of millions each. Still, the sheer volume of cases involving U.S. Toyota owners claiming lost value — 6 million or more — could prove far more costly, adding up to losses in the billions for the automaker.” Meanwhile, the Wall Street Journal (3/10, Sanchanta, Takahashi) reports that Toyota’s total possible losses from its recall crisis could top $5 billion in the coming year.


From the American Association for Justice news release.

FDA Reviewing Information on Fosamax-Related Fractures


In a follow-up piece to Monday evening’s report on femur fractures related to Fosamax (alendronate), ABC World News (3/9, story 4, 2:20, Sawyer) reported that ABC’s Richard Besser, MD, interviewed FDA Deputy Commissioner Joshua Sharfstein, MD, asking him if now is the time for the agency “to send out a notice to physicians to be on the lookout for this” problem. Sharfstein stated that the FDA currently “does not feel a warning on this is justified, but we are continually re-evaluating that as we get more information.” At the end of the piece, Besser voiced concerned that the FDA’s “threshold is too high. I think to send a letter to doctors would show that they take this seriously and would to allow them to get the data they need to make a decision.”

Supreme Court Will Hear Case About Vaccine Side Effects


The Supreme Court will decide whether drug makers can be sued by parents who claim their children suffered serious health problems from vaccines. As reported by the Associated Press, the Court agreed to hear an appeal from parents who want to sue Wyeth over the serious side effects their daughter, six months old at the time, allegedly suffered as a result of the company’s diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis vaccine. The lower court ruled against the parents, and said a 1986 federal law bars their claims.

The idea behind the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act was to ensure a stable supply of childhood vaccines by shielding drug makers from most lawsuits, and setting up a federal vaccine court to handle disputes. The law would serve to block state laws that otherwise would give families the ability to sue the manufacturers. The case is Bruesewitz v. Wyeth, 09-152.

FDA Investigating Possible Fosamax-Related Femur Fractures


If you saw the ABC World News report this week showing the frightening femur fractures that some women who have been using the bisphosphonate drug Fosamax (alendronate) to fight osteoporosis are now suffering, you won’t soon forget it. ABC’s Richard Besser, MD, explained the drug may “limit…bone’s natural ability to protect itself from stress.” He continued, “In 2008, the Food and Drug Administration raised the issue with Merck” which, more than a year later, “added information on the package insert” warning of the possibility of “low energy femoral shaft and subtrochanteric fractures.’” Still, Besser noted, the agency has “never made an effort to inform the public or doctors across the country who are prescribing this drug of this possible side effect,” but said it is “looking into reports of the fractures.”

Report: Congress Should Focus on Curtailing Medical Errors, Not Patients’ Rights


According to an update of the National Practitioner Data Bank released recently, fewer medical malpractice payments were made on behalf of doctors in 2009 than any other year on record. This contradicts claims by some that medical malpractice litigation is to blame for rising health care costs. Last year was the fifth consecutive year the number of payments has fallen, and the sixth straight year in which the value of payments has fallen. In contrast, U.S. health care costs have increased every year since 1965, the earliest year for which such data exist.

Numerous studies have found that injuries and deaths caused by medical errors dwarf the number of actual medical malpractice payments. For example, the Institute of Medicine found in 1999 that 44,000 to 98,000 people die every year due to avoidable errors. Subsequent studies have estimated even higher casualty levels.

You can read much more about this report in Public Citizen’s detailed analysis.

Toyota Workers Raised Safety Concerns in 2006 Memo


Toyota just can’t get out of the headlines. Now more bad news as reported in the Los Angeles Times: Several Toyota workers sent a memo to their bosses in 2006 warning that the auto company was too focused on meeting demand rather than meeting safety standards (my paraphrase). The memo pointed out that from 2000 to 2005 Toyota recalled 36% of all vehicles they sold. This recall rate was higher than other car makers.

The memo went on to state that failure to act of these safety concerns could ”become a great problem that involves the company’s survival.” Finally, the memo said, ”We are concerned about the processes which are essential for producing safe cars, but that ultimately may be ignored, with production continued in the name of competition.”

The workers never received a response from management.

Poor Ratings for 20% of U.S. Nursing Homes


As reported by USA Today one in five of the nation’s 15,700 nursing homes have consistently received poor ratings for overall quality, an analysis of new government data finds. More than a quarter-million patients live in homes given another set of low scores within the past year, according to data released by Medicare, which first released the star ratings of the nation’s nursing homes in late 2008. The ratings are derived from inspections, complaint investigations and other data collected mostly in 2008 and 2009.

Drivers Complain That Toyota’s Fixes Didn’t Work


It appears that Toyota may not be out of the woods yet. More than 50 owners have complained to safety officials that they are still experiencing runaway acceleration even after their vehicles were repaired by Toyota for sticking throttles. So far as I know, these continuing problems have not been verified by the government or confirmed by Toyota.

Friday Fun


Here’s one of the funniest (fake) wedding videos you’ll ever see:

U.S. May Set Rule Requiring Brake Override System


The Obama administration is considering requiring all automobiles to contain a brake override system intended to prevent sudden acceleration episodes like those that have led to the recall of millions of Toyotas, the Transportation secretary, Ray LaHood, said Tuesday. This was reported in the New York Times, and excerpts of the article follow.

This sounds like a perfectly good idea to me. The only downside, other than the cost, would be to deny a few boy-racers the pleasure of powering through a turn with one foot on the accelerator and the other on the brake. That was great fun back in the days of stick-shift sports cars and youthful ignorance about the consequences of high-speed collisions. But we’re all grown up now, right?

The override system is meant to deactivate the accelerator when the brake pedal is pressed. That will let the driver stop safely even if the car’s throttle sticks open. Often called a “smart pedal,” the feature is already found on many automobiles sold worldwide, including models from BMW, Chrysler, Mercedes-Benz, Nissan and Volkswagen.

Without the system, a car’s computer might think a driver wants to keep accelerating, and ignore a driver’s efforts to depress the brake pedal and stop the car. Once the system is installed, it will stop the car if both the brake pedal and accelerator pedal are depressed.

Toyota did not install the system on its cars for several years but has now begun putting it on Camry, Lexus and Avalon models. About 20 percent of its vehicles in North America have an override. Last week, the automaker said the system also would be installed on Tacoma, Venza and Sequoia vehicles.

Through February, the N.H.T.S.A. had received 43 complaints of fatal incidents that reportedly involve unintended acceleration in Toyota vehicles since 2000, the Department of Transportation said. The complaints, which cover 52 fatalities and 38 injuries, have not been confirmed by the department. Three quarters of the incidents were reported to the safety agency in the last four months, since Toyota’s initial recall in October 2009.

On Tuesday, Toyota executives again apologized for the recall, promised to be more responsive to driver complaints as well as safety warnings from the government, and then assured lawmakers that it was taking steps to improve quality control.

Texas Homebuilder Bob Perry Ordered to Pay $51 Million for Defective House


A Tarrant County jury this week has delivered a devastating blow to homebuilder Bob Perry by awarding $51 million to a couple who sued Perry because of their defective house. The back-story to this case is quite lengthy, but the bottom line is that it has been drug out for a decade, and has already been to the Supreme Court of Texas once (where an arbitration award against Perry was overturned).

Perry is the biggest political donor in Texas, and has given enormous sums to each of the nine members of the Supreme Court. So I don’t expect the dollar amount of this verdict to stand up on appeal to that court, but the verdict itself may stand. It would be difficult for the Supreme Court to first say the couple in question wasn’t entitled to keep their arbitration award but had to go to court instead, and then turn around and say they weren’t entitled to go to court either. The appeal will be interesting to watch.

Social Security Hearings Backlog Falls to Lowest Level Since 2005


That’s the headline of a news release today from the Social Security Administration. I applaud the agency for making strides in reducing the inexcusable backlog and waiting times for Social Security disability decisions. I do have a concern though. Recently we have noticed that some of our clients’ disability cases are being pulled, seemingly at random, from the normal process and having early decisions rendered. This is happening to maybe 20% of our cases.

While this is certainly good news for those clients fortunate enough to have their cases decided early, we can’t figure out a pattern. That makes us wonder if perhaps some cases are pulled early just so the average processing time decreases. That’s a cynical view to take, and I have no evidence this is actually happening. Still, it does make us wonder.

Here is the News Release:
Pending Cases Drop Below 700,000; Processing Time Down 72 Days

Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security, today announced that the number of disability hearings pending stands at 697,437 cases — the lowest level since June 2005 and down more than 71,000 cases since December 2008, when the trend of month-by-month reductions began.  In addition, the average processing time for hearing decisions has decreased to 442 days, down from a high of 514 days at the end of fiscal year (FY) 2008.

“We have decreased the number of hearings pending by almost 10 percent over the last 14 months and cut the time it takes to make a decision by nearly two and a half months.  This remarkable progress shows our backlog reduction plan is working,” Commissioner Astrue said.  “With ongoing support from the President and Congress as well as the efforts of our hardworking employees, I am confident the hearings backlog will continue to diminish.”

Social Security has actively addressed the hearings backlog and increased the capacity to hold more hearings.  The agency hired 147 Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) and over 1,000 support staff in FY 2009, and has plans to hire an additional 226 ALJs this year.  The agency now has four National Hearing Centers to help process hearings by video conference for the most hard-hit areas of the country.  The agency also has aggressive plans to open 14 new hearing offices and three satellite offices by the end of the year.  The first of these offices was opened in Anchorage, Alaska on February 19, 2010.

Texas Now Requires Drivers’ Education Course for New Drivers Aged 18 to 24


A law took effect this week that will affect young drivers getting their licenses for the first time. Until now, driver education classes were required only for drivers under the age of 18. Now those between ages 18 and 24 must must take a six-hour driver education course before they can receive licenses. This change won’t affect a huge number of people, but there has been a trend recently for teenagers to wait until they turn 18 before getting a license. Perhaps part of the reason is to avoid the time and expense of drivers’ education.

This seems like a sensible plan to me, due to the significant percentage of car wrecks caused by drivers aged 18-24, although it may work a financial hardship on some of those new drivers.

Traumatic Brain Injuries


This guest post is from Chelsea Travers at CareMeridian.

The brain is a complex and vital organ that shapes who we are. It allows us to understand questions and solve intricate problems, it produces our emotions while crafting our personality, and it helps us to live on both a biological and spiritual level. If it should experience damage then the essence of who we are could be lost forever. This is why traumatic brain injuries can cause grave damage to the life of its victim.

According to Center for Disease Control and Prevention, a traumatic brain injury (also known as TBI) is an affliction that 1.4 million Americans sustain each year, 50,000 of whom don’t survive. While TBIs have differing levels of severity (ranging from mild to severe), they are usually acquired from a simple injury to the head and/or neck. Falls are the leading cause, accounting for 28% of TBIs, while motor vehicle accidents account for 20%. However, motor vehicle accidents have a higher frequency when it comes to TBI hospitalizations, which studies have shown affect more than 280,000 people each year. The causes of the injury are wide in variety and can occur from open or closed head injuries to deceleration injuries (also known as diffuse axonal injuries), but its complexities delve much deeper.

A traumatic brain injury can have life-altering effects on a victim’s emotional and physical well-being, but can also do severe damage to the physical nature of the brain. The injury may require years, if not decades, of special care and rehabilitation from care facilities like CareMeridian, Las Vegas Nursing Home. The impairments from a brain injury can affect speech, vision, coordination, the short term and long term memory, and may even result in mood swings and behavioral changes in personality. Considering that every brain injury is different, rehabilitation depends on the individual case and injury; yet prevention is possible.

For an injury as debilitating as TBI, prevention is essential. Luckily, prevention is not difficult. When driving, the best way to avert a TBI is by wearing a seatbelt and not being under the influence of alcohol. In fact, according to the Brain Injury Association of America more than 50% of people with a brain injury were intoxicated at the time of their injury. It’s also smart to always wear a helmet when riding a bike, thus reducing the risk of a head injury by almost 90%. If the right precautions are taken, the severity of TBIs can be reduced, if not prevented.

There is a lot that is still unknown about the inner workings of the human brain. However, one thing known for certain is the life-changing effects that a TBI can have on its victim as a result of irreversible damage to the brain’s function.

Latest Wrap-Up of Toyota News


The CBS Evening News (2/25, story 7, 3:30, Couric) reported that Toyota CEO Akio Toyoda wept as he thanked a group of Toyota dealers in Washington for “supporting him through the company’s troubles” and said “his company has to rethink its operations after 8.5 million vehicles were recalled for unintended acceleration. All of this has focused new attention on, Toyota of course, the federal agency responsible for the recalls and the revolving door between the two.” The piece notes that some in Congress are critical of ties between NHTSA and Toyota, which has hired a number of its executives away from that agency. “Christopher Santucci’s job at NHTSA was to conduct defects investigations of automakers and some of his probes were into Toyota. … At some point, while working at NHTSA, Santucci negotiated himself a job at Toyota, the very company he’d investigated. … Yesterday, Congress asked Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood if there’s a conflict.” Ray LaHood, Transportation Secretary: “Absolutely not.”

Toyota CEO assures LaHood of recommitment to safety. The AP (2/26, Manning) reports that Toyota CEO Akio Toyoda, speaking at his firm’s “largest North American manufacturing plant” in Georgetown, Kentucky, yesterday, told Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood that Toyota “would ‘advance safety to the next level’ as it tries to restore customer faith in its cars and trucks that has been badly damaged by the recall of 8.5 million vehicles over safety concerns.” Toyoda added that his firm “was ‘at a crossroads.’ ‘We need to rethink everything about our operations,’ he told about 100 workers.” The AP details the legal and public perception problems that are plaguing Toyota, including probes by the FBI and SEC, along “large numbers of death and injury lawsuits” the company expects to spawn from the recall crisis.


Toyota’s safety chief to testify before Senate panel Tuesday.
The Detroit News (2/26, Shepardson) reports that Toyota executive VP Shinichi Sasaki, “who oversees the company’s safety efforts,” is scheduled to testify before the Senate Commerce Committee next Tuesday. The piece notes that acting NHTSA chief Ron Medford met with Sasaki in Japan in December “over the company’s handling of recalls. Also testifying will be Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood, NHTSA administrator David Strickland and Yoshimi Inaba, Toyota’s top North American executive.”


The Los Angeles Times (2/26, Bensinger, Vartabedian) reports that after this week’s hearings, “Washington is just getting started. … Lawmakers said Thursday that they were planning further hearings scrutinizing both Toyota and the federal agency that oversees it. One possible outcome: new laws aimed at keeping regulators up to date with the rapid advances in automotive technology, including computer-controlled engine systems.


Toyota hearings said to benefit trial lawyers.
In his column in the Wall Street Journal (2/26), Holman Jenkins suggests that this week’s congressional hearings into Toyota’s safety issue were for the benefit of trial lawyers, and dismisses the notion that electronic faults could be to blame for incidents of unintended acceleration.


“Win” document cites avoidance of Sienna liftgate recall.
Bloomberg News (2/26, Green, Ohnsman) reports, “Toyota Motor Corp. in 2008 succeeded in blocking a formal recall of Sienna minivans linked by U.S. regulators to 98 injuries caused by collapsing liftgates, according to company and U.S. documents.” The piece notes that Toyota offered owners to replace the liftgates’ struts “as part of a ’safety improvement campaign’ without acknowledging a defect,” in a move approved by NHTSA. “The Sienna case was among the ‘wins’ cited by the automaker’s Washington office in a memo obtained by a congressional panel investigating the recalls of 8 million Toyota vehicles worldwide for defects that could cause unintended acceleration. The claimed wins saved Toyota $255 million, including $100 million previously reported for less extensive responses to the acceleration issue, according to the memo.”


Toyota documents indicate knowledge of new NHTSA powers.
The Detroit Free Press (2/26, Hyde) reports that an internal Toyota document in which the firm described limiting a 2007 recall “a $100 million ‘win’ for the company” also stated “that federal regulators were getting tougher on vehicle recalls.” In the document, Toyota “staff warned Inaba that the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration had new powers to force recalls, including civil fines.” However, “During his testimony Wednesday, Inaba said he did not recall the July 2009 meeting where he received the presentation, but that the claim of saving $100 million by limiting the 2007 recall to floor mats was ‘inconsistent’ with Toyota’s principles.”


Krauthammer says Toyota crisis points out difficulties of industrial product regulation.
In a column in theWashington Post (2/26) Charles Krauthammer writes about the “astonishing array of mass-produced products” available to modern consumers which “are at once wondrous and potentially lethal.” He writes that “sorting out the endless complaints about these products is maddeningly difficult — though sort you must, otherwise every complaint would require shutting down the factories, and we’d have no industrial society at all.” Krauthammer alludes to the “calculation” on how deadly a product must be before it is taken from the market and the difficulty in telling “the idiosyncratic failure from the systemic.” He praises Toyota executives for taking strides to “correct what can be corrected” but concludes that “even the highest technology produced by the world’s finest companies can be fallible and fatal.”


From the American Association for Justice news release.

Friday Fun


I’m not a huge movie fan, but one thing I’ve always enjoyed is the “extended take” — the long, continuous shot with no editing. I’m always impressed by the work that goes into those segments. Apparently someone else likes them even more than I do, because he’s collected the 20 Greatest Extended Takes In Movie History at GeekWeek.com. Enjoy:

Obama Health Proposal Could Reduce Texas Insurance Premiums


It may come as a surprise to those not familiar with Texas politics that Texas does not review most increases in health insurance premiums. Not unless the premium increase is for more than 50% annually. Everything else is fair game. An insurance company can increase premiums 49% per year every year and that would be fine with the State of Texas.

But now we have a health care proposal from the Obama administration that would allow the federal government to review “excessive” health insurance premium increases. The federal government would be able to stop a rate increase it considered unjustified. Whether this is government intervention or consumer protection depends on your point of view, and maybe on whether you’re a health insurance company executive.

Glaxo Defends Handling of Avandia Heart Risks


GlaxoSmithKline said this week that a Senate report criticizing its handling of heart risks with its diabetes drug Avandia “mischaracterizes and distorts” the company’s record. As reported by the Associated Press, Glaxo is unhappy with the way the company’s response to reports of heart attacks caused by Avandia have been characterized by the Food and Drug Administration and the Senate Finance Committee. The Senate report, issued over the weekend, charged that Glaxo downplayed the drug’s safety risks and withheld important data from the FDA. “That suggestion is fundamentally flawed and contradicted by the record of extensive, ongoing interactions between GSK and the FDA,” states the company.

A report in May 2007 showed that Avandia users had a 43% higher risk of heart attacks than patients taking other diabetes drugs or no diabetes drugs at all.

What is A Medical Source Opinion in a Social Security Disability Claim?


When your Social Security Disability claim contains an opinion on your limitations resulting from your disabling impairments, lawyers and judges refer to this as a medical source opinion. Sometimes a medical source opinion can be given by your treating doctors. Your surgeon, for example, might advise you not to lift more than ten pounds. If that instruction is in writing and contained in your medical records, it would probably constitute a medical source opinion. The Judges who decide disability claims must evaluate many such opinions as they evaluate claims.

Often your treating physician will render a medical source opinion. Sometimes they will offer no such opinions even when contacted directly. The judge will, of course, decide the case with or without your treating physician’s opinion because deciding whether you are disabled is an issue reserved for the Social Security Administration. Clients often ask if having their treating physician’s opinion that “they are disabled” is critical to winning their disability benefits. The short answer is that it can be helpful to have such an opinion. But we have won many cases without such opinions, based on other evidence in the file. We often assist our clients in obtaining medical source opinions helpful to winning their disability claims.

Fellow blogger and attorney Gordon Gates has recently posted some good points about medical source opinions as well. We suggest that you read his article.

If you, or someone you know, is suffering from severe health problems keeping you from working, please feel free to contact us. If you are considering a Social Security Disability claim, we advise you to speak with an attorney. We handle cases throughout the state of Texas, but we are always happy to give you a referral if we are unable to assist you.

Warning: Hospitals May Be Hazardous To Your Health


An estimated 48,000 people died in 2006 after developing sepsis or pneumonia during their hospital stays, according to a study published in this week’s edition of Archives of Internal Medicine. Such infections forced patients to spend an extra 2.3 million days in the hospital and cost $8.1 billion to treat, the study found. This was reported in the health care blog of the L.A. Times. From the article:

“These figures are likely to be underestimates because they focus on infections that were acquired and diagnosed during the same hospitalization, although many [hospital acquired infections], including most surgical site infections, are not diagnosed until after hospital discharge.”

If that’s not scary enough, study co-author Anup Malani from the University of Chicago Law School had this to say in a news release: “In some cases, relatively healthy people check into the hospital for routine surgery. They develop sepsis because of a lapse in infection control – and they can die.”

He added that the nation’s hospitals need to find a better way to reduce the risk of infections. Let’s hope the nation’s hospitals are listening.